Florida
Osceola County, Florida short-term rental rules
Overview
Osceola County covers most of the purpose-built vacation-home communities marketed as Kissimmee. The county maintains a Short Term Rental Planned Development (STRPD) zoning district specifically for short-term rental housing, so the first question for any parcel is whether short-term rental use is actually permitted in its district. The Osceola County Tax Collector administers a Tourist Development Tax of 6% (effective July 1, 2004) on the total rental amount for stays of less than 180 days, and requires a Local Business Tax Receipt application for short- and long-term rental businesses.
Areas covered: Unincorporated Osceola County, Much of the resort-community inventory marketed as Kissimmee, Areas outside the Kissimmee and St. Cloud city limits · Last verified
Verified requirements for Osceola County, Florida
Each item below was read from the official document cited with it. Nothing here is generic guidance.
capsZoning
Osceola County established a Short Term Rental Planned Development (STRPD) zoning district and a short-term rental overlay map; applicants must verify zoning allows short-term rentals before applying for a license.
Source: Osceola County — STRPD District (Short Term Rental Planned Development) (opens in a new tab) · STRPD District (Short Term Rental Planned Development) · Verified
taxes
Osceola County's Tourist Development Tax is a 6% charge on the total rental amount for short-term rentals (under 180 days), administered under Chapter 13, Article III of the County Code.
Source: Osceola County Tax Collector — Tourist Development Taxes (opens in a new tab) · Ch. 13, Art. III · Verified
Regulation research score
How far the short-term-rental rules we confirmed from cited official sources for Osceola County, Florida constrain an ordinary non-owner-occupied, whole-home short-term rental, expressed on a 0–100 burden scale built from 12 weighted criteria in two dimensions: market access and operating compliance. Higher means more constrained. It is not a legal conclusion, a permissiveness rating, a market rating, a measure of desirability, legality or profitability, and not investment advice.
Major eligibility or supply barriers are documented — narrow zoning, hard caps or waitlists, discretionary conditional-use approval, severe spacing, or entity limits — so entry depends on more than completing paperwork.
No severe market-access trigger is documented, so this jurisdiction is capped below the effectively-restricted band. A major access constraint is documented, which makes the high-access band available. Access sub-score 65, operating sub-score 5.
Based on 17% evidence coverage. 10 criteria are unresolved, so this is an observed floor: the plausible interval reaches 100 of 100. A low observed score here means "little confirmed", not "lightly regulated".
Market access and eligibility · 65 of 100
- Zoning eligibility, caps, density or spacingMajor access constraint · 65
Short-term rentals are tied to an STRPD zoning district and overlay map; zoning eligibility must be verified before licensing.
Operating and compliance · 5 of 100
- Lodging tax or fees5 pts
Operating rules are weighted at 0.45, so compliance requirements alone cannot push a jurisdiction past Moderate / structured.
- Burden estimate
- 73 of 100 · High access constraints
- Uncertainty interval
- 51–100 of 100
- Evidence coverage
- 17% · 2 of 12 criteria resolved
- Confidence
- Low — provisional
- Last reviewed
Low confidence — provisional. Only 17% of the rubric is resolved against official sources. The observed estimate of 73 counts confirmed evidence only; unresolved criteria widen the interval upward to 100, a range that crosses more than one burden category. Treat it as indicative, not precise, and confirm directly with the jurisdiction.
This range crosses more than one burden category (Moderate / structured, High access constraints, Very high / effectively restricted). The single estimate above is indicative only — do not read it as a precise measurement of this jurisdiction's rules.
2 of 12 rubric criteria resolved against cited official sources.
Why this score
Market-access findings are graded severe, major, moderate or none from the cited official claim itself; the most severe finding scores in full and each additional finding adds a quarter of its points, so correlated restrictions are never double-counted. The operating sub-score is a weighted count out of 100 and is multiplied by 0.45, which is why routine permitting, inspection, contact, tax and enforcement rules alone cannot exceed the Moderate / structured band. An unresolved criterion is never recorded as 'not required' and never scored as zero: it enters the central estimate at a quarter of its worst case and reaches its full worst case at the top of the published interval, but it can never release the gates that open the high-access or effectively-restricted bands — those read confirmed findings only. Every result therefore ships as estimate, interval, evidence coverage and confidence together.
- Prohibition or closed entry25.00 pts (range 0–100 of 100)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 100 access points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Owner-occupancy or primary residence25.00 pts (range 0–100 of 100)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 100 access points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Zoning eligibility, caps, density or spacing65.00 pts (range 65–65 of 65)
Confirmed by a cited official source and graded major access constraint (65 access points). Short-term rentals are tied to an STRPD zoning district and overlay map; zoning eligibility must be verified before licensing.
- Minimum or maximum stay8.75 pts (range 0–35 of 35)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 35 access points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Permit, licence, or registration5.50 pts (range 0–22 of 22)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 22 operating points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Inspection or life-safety certification4.00 pts (range 0–16 of 16)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 16 operating points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Occupancy and parking3.50 pts (range 0–14 of 14)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 14 operating points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Enforcement and penalties3.50 pts (range 0–14 of 14)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 14 operating points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Local responsible party3.00 pts (range 0–12 of 12)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 12 operating points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Renewal or transfer2.50 pts (range 0–10 of 10)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 10 operating points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Advertising and listing rules1.75 pts (range 0–7 of 7)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 7 operating points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Lodging tax or fees5.00 pts (range 5–5 of 5)
Confirmed by a cited official source, so it scores its full 5 of 100 operating points.
What we could not confirm — and what to ask
We found no official source resolving these 10 criteria either way. They are not treated as “not required” and are not scored as zero. Confirm each one with the department listed below before you rely on it.
- Prohibition or closed entry — unknown; could add 0–100 points.
- Owner-occupancy or primary residence — unknown; could add 0–100 points.
- Minimum or maximum stay — unknown; could add 0–35 points.
- Permit, licence, or registration — unknown; could add 0–22 points.
- Inspection or life-safety certification — unknown; could add 0–16 points.
- Occupancy and parking — unknown; could add 0–14 points.
- Enforcement and penalties — unknown; could add 0–14 points.
- Local responsible party — unknown; could add 0–12 points.
- Renewal or transfer — unknown; could add 0–10 points.
- Advertising and listing rules — unknown; could add 0–7 points.
The rubric
- Prohibition or closed entryNot confirmed
Does an official source prohibit short-term rentals outright, close the application window, or restrict eligibility so narrowly that most properties cannot qualify?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Owner-occupancy or primary residenceNot confirmed
Does an official source require the owner to occupy the property or hold it as a primary residence?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Zoning eligibility, caps, density or spacingConfirmed — applies
Does an official source restrict which zones short-term rentals may operate in, or cap, space, or ration how many may exist?
- Minimum or maximum stayNot confirmed
Does an official source set a minimum night requirement or a maximum rental term?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Permit, licence, or registrationNot confirmed
Does an official source require a permit, licence, certificate, or registration before the property is advertised?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Inspection or life-safety certificationNot confirmed
Does an official source require an inspection, fire or building certification, or posted safety information?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Occupancy and parkingNot confirmed
Does an official source set an occupancy limit or an on-site parking requirement?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Enforcement and penaltiesNot confirmed
Does an official source publish penalties, suspension, revocation, or a complaint process for violations?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Local responsible partyNot confirmed
Does an official source require a named local contact who must respond within a set time?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Renewal or transferNot confirmed
Does an official source set a renewal cycle, or restrict transfer of the permit on sale?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Advertising and listing rulesNot confirmed
Does an official source govern how the property may be advertised — for example requiring the permit number in every listing?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Lodging tax or feesConfirmed — applies
Does an official source impose a lodging, excise, or permit fee obligation on the operator?
How the category is set on the 0–100 scale: 80+ reads very high / effectively restricted and requires a documented severe market-access trigger; 60–79 reads high access constraints and requires a documented major access constraint (or two moderate ones); 40–59 reads moderate / structured, which is the ceiling for jurisdictions whose confirmed rules are operating requirements only; 20–39 reads lower regulatory burden; below 20 reads minimal STR-specific burden located. A documented official-source search that resolves criteria and finds no short-term-rental-specific requirement reads “no local STR-specific regulation located in reviewed official sources” — which is not a statement that operating here is unrestricted, legal, or low-risk. Unconfirmed criteria never count as permissive. How to confirm the rest yourself.
Who to ask in Osceola County, Florida
Department-level contact details as published on the jurisdiction’s own website. We do not publish individual staff contact information.
Osceola County Planning, Zoning and Design Department
Verify zoning eligibility for a short-term rental and get guidance on the Short Term Rental Planned Development (STRPD) process.
Published at this official page · checked
Osceola County Tax Collector
Register for and obtain the Local Business Tax Receipt (LBTR) required for short/long-term rentals.
Published at this official page · checked
General research checklist (not Osceola County, Florida specific)
These are the categories short-term rental owners check anywhere in the US. They are general prompts, not this jurisdiction’s ordinance.
- Occupancy limits
- Most jurisdictions tie maximum overnight occupancy to bedroom count, septic capacity, or a fixed cap. Confirm the current figure for your specific parcel with Osceola County before advertising a sleeping capacity.
- Parking
- On-site parking counts and prohibitions on street or shoulder parking are among the most commonly enforced short-term rental provisions. Verify the required count with Osceola County and state it plainly in your listing.
- Life-safety requirements
- Smoke and carbon monoxide alarms, fire extinguishers, egress, and posted evacuation information are typical requirements. Some jurisdictions inspect; others self-certify. Verify which applies.
- Local responsible party
- Many ordinances require a named local contact who can respond to the property within a set time. Confirm whether a contact is required, what response window applies, and how it must be filed with Osceola County.
- Renewal and enforcement
- Registrations and permits generally renew on a fixed cycle, and enforcement is usually complaint-driven with escalating penalties. Confirm the renewal date, fee, and enforcement process with Osceola County.
- Lodging and sales tax
- State and local lodging or occupancy taxes may be collected by the booking platform, by you, or split. Confirm current collection responsibility with both the taxing authority and your platform — platform collection agreements change.
Confirm these directly — we could not verify them
We publish gaps rather than guesses. The following were not confirmable from a current official source at our last review.
- The correct order of operations between zoning approval, the state DBPR license, and county tax registration
- Whether the Local Business Tax Receipt requirement and STRPD zoning apply county-wide or only in specific districts
- Current fees, renewal cycle, and enforcement penalties
- Whether your platform remits the county Tourist Development Tax on your behalf
Official sources
Government sources only. If a link has moved, go to the jurisdiction’s main site and search for short-term or vacation rentals.
- Osceola County, Florida — official county website (opens in a new tab)
- Osceola County — Short Term Rental Planned Development (STRPD) zoning district (opens in a new tab)
- Osceola County — business and rental licensing (opens in a new tab)
- Osceola County Tax Collector — Local Business Tax Receipt application, short/long term rental (PDF) (opens in a new tab)
- Osceola County Tax Collector — Tourist Development Tax (opens in a new tab)
- Osceola County Tax Collector — Tourist Development Tax compliance (opens in a new tab)
- Florida DBPR — Division of Hotels and Restaurants (vacation rental licensing) (opens in a new tab)
- Florida Department of Revenue (opens in a new tab)
Change log
- — Entry published. Official source links checked; no jurisdiction-specific ordinance text confirmed.
Operating a rental here?
Compliance is the owner’s responsibility in every model, including ours. What a co-host can do is keep the listing, messaging, and pricing consistent with the rules you confirm.
Nearby jurisdictions
- Orange County, Florida short-term rental rules
- City of Orlando, Florida short-term rental rules
- City of Kissimmee, Florida short-term rental rules
- State of Alabama — lodgings tax short-term rental rules
- City of Gulf Shores, Alabama short-term rental rules
- City of Orange Beach, Alabama short-term rental rules
- State of Arizona — short-term lodging tax short-term rental rules
- City of Scottsdale, Arizona short-term rental rules
- City of Sedona, Arizona short-term rental rules
- State of Utah — transient room tax short-term rental rules
- Park City, Utah short-term rental rules
- Summit County, Utah short-term rental regulation research guide
- City of St. George, Utah short-term rental rules
- City of Palm Springs, California short-term rental rules
- San Bernardino County, California short-term rental rules
- City of Big Bear Lake, California short-term rental rules
- City of South Lake Tahoe, California short-term rental rules
- Placer County, California (North Lake Tahoe) short-term rental rules
- State of South Carolina — accommodations tax short-term rental rules
- City of Myrtle Beach, South Carolina short-term rental rules
- Horry County, South Carolina short-term rental regulation research guide
- Town of Hilton Head Island, South Carolina short-term rental rules
- City of Charleston, South Carolina short-term rental rules
- City of Folly Beach, South Carolina short-term rental rules
- State of North Carolina — accommodations tax short-term rental rules
- Dare County, North Carolina (Outer Banks) short-term rental rules
- City of Asheville, North Carolina short-term rental rules
- Buncombe County, North Carolina short-term rental regulation research guide
- State of Louisiana — accommodations tax short-term rental rules
- City of New Orleans, Louisiana short-term rental rules
- State of Texas — hotel occupancy tax short-term rental rules
- City of Austin, Texas short-term rental rules
- City of Galveston, Texas short-term rental rules
- Metro Nashville & Davidson County, TN short-term rental rules
- Massachusetts — room occupancy excise short-term rental rules
- Clark County, Nevada short-term rental rules
- City of Las Vegas, Nevada short-term rental rules
- Washoe County, Nevada short-term rental rules
- Ketchum, Idaho short-term rental regulation research guide
- McCall, Idaho short-term rental regulation research guide
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania short-term rental rules
- Pocono Township, Pennsylvania short-term rental rules
- Lehman Township, Pennsylvania short-term rental rules
- Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania short-term rental rules
- Louisville Metro, Kentucky short-term rental rules
- Lexington-Fayette County, Kentucky short-term rental rules
- Bowling Green, Kentucky short-term rental rules
- Covington, Kentucky short-term rental rules
- Virginia Beach, Virginia short-term rental rules
- Richmond, Virginia short-term rental rules
- Traverse City, Michigan short-term rental rules
- South Haven, Michigan short-term rental rules
- Petoskey, Michigan short-term rental rules
- New York City, New York short-term rental rules
- Town of East Hampton, New York short-term rental rules
- Town of Southampton, New York short-term rental rules
- Saratoga Springs, New York short-term rental rules
- City & County of Honolulu (Oahu), Hawaii short-term rental regulation research guide
- Maui County, Hawaii short-term rental regulation research guide
- Hawaii County (Big Island), Hawaii short-term rental regulation research guide
- Kauai County, Hawaii short-term rental regulation research guide
- City of Whitefish, Montana short-term rental regulation research guide
- City of Bozeman, Montana short-term rental regulation research guide
- Big Sky / Gallatin County, Montana short-term rental regulation research guide
- City of Missoula, Montana short-term rental regulation research guide
- City of Santa Fe, New Mexico short-term rental regulation research guide
- City of Albuquerque, New Mexico short-term rental regulation research guide
- Town of Taos and Taos County, New Mexico short-term rental regulation research guide
- Village of Ruidoso, New Mexico short-term rental regulation research guide
- Boston, Massachusetts short-term rental rules
- Barnstable, Massachusetts short-term rental rules
- Provincetown, Massachusetts short-term rental rules
- Portland, Maine short-term rental rules
- Bar Harbor, Maine short-term rental rules
- Burlington, Vermont short-term rental rules
- Newport, Rhode Island short-term rental rules
- Hudson, New York short-term rental rules
- Woodstock, New York short-term rental rules
- Columbus, Ohio short-term rental rules
- Cleveland, Ohio short-term rental rules
- Cincinnati, Ohio short-term rental rules
- Village of Put-in-Bay (South Bass Island), Ohio short-term rental rules
- Put-in-Bay Township, Ohio short-term rental rules
Found a change in Osceola County, Florida?
Send the official link and we'll re-verify this entry. We'd rather correct it than leave a stale requirement up.
go@vacohost.com