Tennessee
City of Sevierville, Tennessee short-term rental rules
Overview
Sevierville regulates short-term rentals inside its city limits separately from Sevier County. A large share of inventory marketed as Sevierville is actually in unincorporated county, so parcel verification matters here more than in the other two cities.
Areas covered: Properties inside the Sevierville city limits · Last verified
Verified requirements for City of Sevierville, Tennessee
Each item below was read from the official document cited with it. Nothing here is generic guidance.
permit
The Sevierville Municipal Code requires an operational permit for the operation of a Short-Term Rental Unit, which is defined as a residential dwelling, condominium, or apartment rented to transients and is explicitly stated not to be a hotel.
Source: Sevierville Municipal Code (opens in a new tab) · Section 105.6.47 - Short-Term Rental Unit · Verified
permit
The code defines a Short-Term Rental Unit at Section 105.6.47.1 as a residential dwelling, condominium, or apartment used to house transient guests, distinguishing it from hotel/motel uses for permitting purposes.
Source: Sevierville Municipal Code (opens in a new tab) · Section 105.6.47.1 - Definition · Verified
capsZoning
The code includes a grandfathering provision allowing existing short-term rental units to continue operating at their current status under specified conditions, distinguishing pre-existing STRs from new applicants.
Source: Sevierville Municipal Code (opens in a new tab) · Section 105.6.47 (Existing short-term rental units) · Verified
Regulation research score
How far the short-term-rental rules we confirmed from cited official sources for City of Sevierville, Tennessee constrain an ordinary non-owner-occupied, whole-home short-term rental, expressed on a 0–100 burden scale built from 12 weighted criteria in two dimensions: market access and operating compliance. Higher means more constrained. It is not a legal conclusion, a permissiveness rating, a market rating, a measure of desirability, legality or profitability, and not investment advice.
Short-term rentals are generally viable but sit inside a real compliance framework: permitting, inspections, operating standards, or localised zoning verification. This can mean a clearer path to compliance; it is not a recommendation, a rating, or an investment view.
No major market-access constraint is documented here. The rules we confirmed are operating and compliance requirements, which are capped at the top of Moderate / structured — a jurisdiction never becomes high-burden for having permits, inspections, a local contact, taxes or nuisance rules. Access sub-score 35, operating sub-score 22.
Based on 17% evidence coverage. 10 criteria are unresolved, so this is an observed floor: the plausible interval reaches 100 of 100. A low observed score here means "little confirmed", not "lightly regulated".
Market access and eligibility · 35 of 100
- Zoning eligibility, caps, density or spacingModerate access step · 35
A grandfathering provision distinguishes pre-existing units from new applicants; no cap or district exclusion is cited.
Operating and compliance · 22 of 100
- Permit, licence, or registration22 pts
Operating rules are weighted at 0.45, so compliance requirements alone cannot push a jurisdiction past Moderate / structured.
- Burden estimate
- 56 of 100 · Moderate / structured
- Uncertainty interval
- 36–100 of 100
- Evidence coverage
- 17% · 2 of 12 criteria resolved
- Confidence
- Low — provisional
- Last reviewed
Low confidence — provisional. Only 17% of the rubric is resolved against official sources. The observed estimate of 56 counts confirmed evidence only; unresolved criteria widen the interval upward to 100, a range that crosses more than one burden category. Treat it as indicative, not precise, and confirm directly with the jurisdiction.
This range crosses more than one burden category (Lower regulatory burden, Moderate / structured, High access constraints, Very high / effectively restricted). The single estimate above is indicative only — do not read it as a precise measurement of this jurisdiction's rules.
2 of 12 rubric criteria resolved against cited official sources.
Why this score
Market-access findings are graded severe, major, moderate or none from the cited official claim itself; the most severe finding scores in full and each additional finding adds a quarter of its points, so correlated restrictions are never double-counted. The operating sub-score is a weighted count out of 100 and is multiplied by 0.45, which is why routine permitting, inspection, contact, tax and enforcement rules alone cannot exceed the Moderate / structured band. An unresolved criterion is never recorded as 'not required' and never scored as zero: it enters the central estimate at a quarter of its worst case and reaches its full worst case at the top of the published interval, but it can never release the gates that open the high-access or effectively-restricted bands — those read confirmed findings only. Every result therefore ships as estimate, interval, evidence coverage and confidence together.
- Prohibition or closed entry25.00 pts (range 0–100 of 100)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 100 access points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Owner-occupancy or primary residence25.00 pts (range 0–100 of 100)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 100 access points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Zoning eligibility, caps, density or spacing35.00 pts (range 35–35 of 65)
Confirmed by a cited official source and graded moderate access step (35 access points). A grandfathering provision distinguishes pre-existing units from new applicants; no cap or district exclusion is cited.
- Minimum or maximum stay8.75 pts (range 0–35 of 35)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 35 access points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Permit, licence, or registration22.00 pts (range 22–22 of 22)
Confirmed by a cited official source, so it scores its full 22 of 100 operating points.
- Inspection or life-safety certification4.00 pts (range 0–16 of 16)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 16 operating points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Occupancy and parking3.50 pts (range 0–14 of 14)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 14 operating points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Enforcement and penalties3.50 pts (range 0–14 of 14)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 14 operating points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Local responsible party3.00 pts (range 0–12 of 12)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 12 operating points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Renewal or transfer2.50 pts (range 0–10 of 10)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 10 operating points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Advertising and listing rules1.75 pts (range 0–7 of 7)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 7 operating points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
- Lodging tax or fees1.25 pts (range 0–5 of 5)
Not confirmed either way. It is never recorded as "not required" and never scored as zero: it enters the estimate at 25% of its worst case and widens the upper bound by up to 5 operating points. It can never on its own move this jurisdiction into a higher-access band — those gates read confirmed findings only.
What we could not confirm — and what to ask
We found no official source resolving these 10 criteria either way. They are not treated as “not required” and are not scored as zero. Confirm each one with the department listed below before you rely on it.
- Prohibition or closed entry — unknown; could add 0–100 points.
- Owner-occupancy or primary residence — unknown; could add 0–100 points.
- Minimum or maximum stay — unknown; could add 0–35 points.
- Inspection or life-safety certification — unknown; could add 0–16 points.
- Occupancy and parking — unknown; could add 0–14 points.
- Enforcement and penalties — unknown; could add 0–14 points.
- Local responsible party — unknown; could add 0–12 points.
- Renewal or transfer — unknown; could add 0–10 points.
- Advertising and listing rules — unknown; could add 0–7 points.
- Lodging tax or fees — unknown; could add 0–5 points.
The rubric
- Prohibition or closed entryNot confirmed
Does an official source prohibit short-term rentals outright, close the application window, or restrict eligibility so narrowly that most properties cannot qualify?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Owner-occupancy or primary residenceNot confirmed
Does an official source require the owner to occupy the property or hold it as a primary residence?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Zoning eligibility, caps, density or spacingConfirmed — applies
Does an official source restrict which zones short-term rentals may operate in, or cap, space, or ration how many may exist?
- Minimum or maximum stayNot confirmed
Does an official source set a minimum night requirement or a maximum rental term?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Permit, licence, or registrationConfirmed — applies
Does an official source require a permit, licence, certificate, or registration before the property is advertised?
- Inspection or life-safety certificationNot confirmed
Does an official source require an inspection, fire or building certification, or posted safety information?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Occupancy and parkingNot confirmed
Does an official source set an occupancy limit or an on-site parking requirement?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Enforcement and penaltiesNot confirmed
Does an official source publish penalties, suspension, revocation, or a complaint process for violations?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Local responsible partyNot confirmed
Does an official source require a named local contact who must respond within a set time?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Renewal or transferNot confirmed
Does an official source set a renewal cycle, or restrict transfer of the permit on sale?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Advertising and listing rulesNot confirmed
Does an official source govern how the property may be advertised — for example requiring the permit number in every listing?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
- Lodging tax or feesNot confirmed
Does an official source impose a lodging, excise, or permit fee obligation on the operator?
Unknown. We have not found an official source either way. It is never recorded as “not required” and never scored as zero — it is carried through the estimate as an explicit range and should be confirmed with the jurisdiction.
How the category is set on the 0–100 scale: 80+ reads very high / effectively restricted and requires a documented severe market-access trigger; 60–79 reads high access constraints and requires a documented major access constraint (or two moderate ones); 40–59 reads moderate / structured, which is the ceiling for jurisdictions whose confirmed rules are operating requirements only; 20–39 reads lower regulatory burden; below 20 reads minimal STR-specific burden located. A documented official-source search that resolves criteria and finds no short-term-rental-specific requirement reads “no local STR-specific regulation located in reviewed official sources” — which is not a statement that operating here is unrestricted, legal, or low-risk. Unconfirmed criteria never count as permissive. How to confirm the rest yourself.
Who to ask in City of Sevierville, Tennessee
Department-level contact details as published on the jurisdiction’s own website. We do not publish individual staff contact information.
City of Sevierville Fire Department – Fire Prevention Bureau
Apply for and inspect a Short-Term Rental Unit (STR) permit required to operate within Sevierville city limits.
Published at this official page · checked
General research checklist (not City of Sevierville, Tennessee specific)
These are the categories short-term rental owners check anywhere in the US. They are general prompts, not this jurisdiction’s ordinance.
- Occupancy limits
- Most jurisdictions tie maximum overnight occupancy to bedroom count, septic capacity, or a fixed cap. Confirm the current figure for your specific parcel with the City of Sevierville before advertising a sleeping capacity.
- Parking
- On-site parking counts and prohibitions on street or shoulder parking are among the most commonly enforced short-term rental provisions. Verify the required count with the City of Sevierville and state it plainly in your listing.
- Life-safety requirements
- Smoke and carbon monoxide alarms, fire extinguishers, egress, and posted evacuation information are typical requirements. Some jurisdictions inspect; others self-certify. Verify which applies.
- Local responsible party
- Many ordinances require a named local contact who can respond to the property within a set time. Confirm whether a contact is required, what response window applies, and how it must be filed with the City of Sevierville.
- Renewal and enforcement
- Registrations and permits generally renew on a fixed cycle, and enforcement is usually complaint-driven with escalating penalties. Confirm the renewal date, fee, and enforcement process with the City of Sevierville.
- Lodging and sales tax
- State and local lodging or occupancy taxes may be collected by the booking platform, by you, or split. Confirm current collection responsibility with both the taxing authority and your platform — platform collection agreements change.
Confirm these directly — we could not verify them
We publish gaps rather than guesses. The following were not confirmable from a current official source at our last review.
- Needs confirmation — The seviervilletn.org/467/Short-Term-Rentals page and the Fire Prevention STR page render via heavy JavaScript; the scrape tool returned only a loading shell, so specific current permit fee, minimum-stay rule, occupancy/parking limits, renewal cadence, and advertising requirements could not be confirmed from that page's actual body text within the time available.
- Needs confirmation — Could not locate an official Sevierville-specific local hotel/motel occupancy tax ordinance page or rate; TN local occupancy tax for Sevierville is administered by the city/county but the specific current rate and citation were not confirmed against an official source (only third-party aggregator figures were found, which were not used per sourcing rules).
- Needs confirmation — Could not confirm an owner-occupancy requirement, exact numeric STR cap, or enforcement/penalty section text beyond the Section 105.6.47 permit and grandfathering language found in the MTAS-published code PDF.
- Whether your parcel is inside the city limits
- City registration and inspection requirements
- Zoning districts in which short-term rental use is permitted
- City tax registration and remittance responsibility
Official sources
Government sources only. If a link has moved, go to the jurisdiction’s main site and search for short-term or vacation rentals.
Change log
- — Entry published. Official source links checked; no jurisdiction-specific ordinance text confirmed.
Operating a rental here?
Compliance is the owner’s responsibility in every model, including ours. What a co-host can do is keep the listing, messaging, and pricing consistent with the rules you confirm.
Nearby jurisdictions
Found a change in City of Sevierville, Tennessee?
Send the official link and we'll re-verify this entry. We'd rather correct it than leave a stale requirement up.
go@vacohost.com